A belt saturated by 4 miners (180/min) leading to trash should move shapes at a rate of 180/min, but due to the presence of a loop which is blocked it instead moves at a rate of 177/min.
This behavior depends on placement order:
- If the belt is transporting 177/min, this design can be made to transport 180/min by deleting and re-placing the belt merge consuming the stacker output.
- If the belt is transporting 180/min, this design can be made to transport 177/min by deleting and re-placing the belt splitter supplying the stacker input.
When reloading a save or pasting the design, which behavior it has appears to depend unpredictably on the location it is placed.
Blueprint:
SHAPEZ2-4-H4sIALCs72kA/5yUbUvDMBDHv8vhy/girSDk5dyEwQaylaHIXhztbQuGZFxTdIx+d1M6S611DyWQEHK//O+JO8IKlJTxo4DRC6gj3PnDnkDBqNAm03YLAqaps9XTGD2Cegcd7urnPQdhC2PqDfId7kk9FfWCdSlgYj1rygN4hFdQ9w8C3sIhBSRBJmHMd2PaYGH81Hpii2aFrNF6KEVDLEBFNTAi40/2M9p0mblmdkxZw8ZddkGYEfcr/qGjxtfwSTzIgajtwHJvtA/2MnHR7BIpfyVq6TH9uNpx2VadE2+Jo8TJs5q9OX52/Imc/VMaKYZQp6xG15e1Q9ay8lJ0LaqbjDiYn9WQw3su7glv8uUZU+/4fKvH7fhuRgfK3aa2DoNCW+TDijjX1WCopkdZfgsgwAAmIF2pSQQAAA==$
This MCVE is reduced from my crystal-free standalone pin manufacturer, which re-uses the scaffolding shapes in a loop. I first reduced it to a stacker loop, then when testing realized that the shapes don't even need to traverse the loop to observe a throughput reduction.