#How can this simulator be solved to output for both shapes the same result in the same output?
little cove
I've used the bottom wire output to validate that the shape is correct before sending it to crystallization
but if the layer is all crystal .. it isn't cracking the crystal and the output is not all pins as expected 🙁
vague ridge
I'm not sure what you're asking but nothing seems unusual in the screenshot
little cove
it seems the A area has not the same effect on a layer full of crystal ..since it will result in a single layer in the next step, comparred to 2 layers in the below shape :
vague ridge
Yeah the full layer of crystal breaks when you try to stack it
little cove
yup .. I need a different simulation .. that at the end will replace all crystal with pins
I think this current solution I had it from zman .. and was working in version 0.1.1 .. or I didn't had a layer full of crystal at that point
vague ridge
@safe shadow do you have a crystal-pin replacer circuit handy?
safe shadow
little cove
does it still work for shape {cucucucu} ?
woeful prismBOT
little cove
I think it's the same circuit 😄
vague ridge
It's very (not actually very) different
safe shadow
let me load up that save and check.. .that was an old screenshot, but I believe it works
vague ridge
You are pinning the bottom input of the first stacker, not the top here
little cove
aaa. ok, let me try to switch
safe shadow
SHAPEZ2-4-H4sIAHBx62kA/6ST32vCMBDH/5djj9lD24dBwAdbHTjc0DmrMnwINuq5kEp+MErp/77EVpTZydwIJITj873vXXIlpECDIHogEI+AlnBnij0HCrFFkaHcAIHBKpc+1GOGAX0HdHd6jGsg0gpRb6C3bM9pYusFy4pAXxqFXDuwhDnQ+5DAwqUk8OayJLnUhkkzwY1kosfXzAozkIYrd02ZQhdzDhJvaNOPk268y2YvwSJKd9m404GK1KLBQdQfr0DDWnuGijeKQ76+UD1DHRNdMI+5+mQqu4LVZbTCT1auDOayjW6MeiJFZSwTE8NWH1y1l/+MSuWKZwf2lKxBRyhHVm9/go8Jg1tacmrmnzzOv7Xl9jceD9OumSbBeHj2xmGbq6mX/r2v8Px/9FDvBSuuNG5+qOHfWaNbP8nSDSNKpoqUK41++PyEVtWXAAMAjUCDHq0DAAA=$
vague ridge
Srry to bug you zman but thx
safe shadow
lol, np